.png)
.png)
If your store runs Catalog Ads on Meta, TikTok, or Google Shopping, you’ve probably heard of Socioh. Built as a Shopify-friendly plugin, Socioh gives smaller brands a way to launch dynamic product ads quickly.
But what happens when you grow? That’s where the search for Socioh alternatives begins.
While Socioh has its place for small catalogs and light spend, most scaling brands eventually run into the same problems: limited creative features, rising costs as spend grows, and the inability to optimize large product feeds. That’s why more brands are moving to Marpipe, the only creative automation platform that includes free product feed management, advanced automation, and flat-fee pricing.
Catalog ads aren’t new, but their role in performance marketing has changed dramatically over the past five years. What used to be seen as a “set-and-forget” format has become one of the most critical levers for growth.
Today, more than 80% of eCommerce ad clicks on Google Shopping and Meta are tied to catalog-driven formats. These ads pull directly from structured product feeds, meaning that your data is no longer just technical back-end infrastructure, it’s the creative input that shapes every impression.
Catalog ads are also powering conversational commerce. When someone asks an AI-driven search tool, “Show me athleisure under $150 made from sustainable materials,” the engine doesn’t guess. It pulls structured data directly from product feeds. That means the quality of your feed, and the creative automation layered on top, determines whether or not you’re discovered in these high-intent moments.
It’s important to start by giving credit where it’s due. Socioh has carved out a niche by making catalog ads accessible to smaller Shopify brands that may not have the technical expertise or budget for enterprise-level platforms.
Socioh integrates easily with Shopify, making setup quick and relatively painless. It offers basic creative customization, allowing users to create decent-looking templates without much design experience. For businesses running fewer than 500 SKUs, it can feel like a good way to “dip a toe” into dynamic product advertising without committing to larger, more complex platforms.
This is why many brands describe Socioh as a starter kit. It provides just enough functionality to help smaller advertisers get catalog ads live and running, without overwhelming them with enterprise-level complexity. And for brands spending under $25k per month on dynamic product ads, this level of functionality can sometimes feel like enough.
But the reality is that most eCommerce brands don’t want to stay small forever. And when growth happens, Socioh starts to show its limits.
The biggest challenge with Socioh is that it was never designed for scale. What feels like a benefit at first, simplicity and low-cost accessibility, quickly becomes a liability when your advertising strategy matures.
One of the first friction points is catalog size. Socioh was not built to handle large feeds efficiently. Once your SKU count crosses the 500 mark, performance bottlenecks appear. Missing attributes, broken images, and sync errors start to creep into your product feed, and because Socioh lacks any true feed optimization capabilities, those errors flow straight into your ads. For small catalogs, this isn’t noticeable. But for growing ones, it’s a constant headache.
Another pain point is creative capability. In 2025, static product images are no longer enough. Video is the format driving the highest engagement and return, and platforms like Meta and TikTok prioritize motion-first ads in their algorithms. Socioh doesn’t support product-level video generation, leaving its users at a creative disadvantage against competitors who are running scroll-stopping video catalog ads. Similarly, as AI transforms creative workflows, Socioh has not kept pace. There’s no generative AI for building new creative concepts, no automated background swaps, and no intelligent variation generation. You’re limited to static templates.
Pricing is another area where frustration builds. Socioh’s pricing model scales with your ad spend. That might seem fair on the surface, but in practice it means you’re penalized for growth. The more you spend, the more you pay, without necessarily receiving additional value. For marketers working to drive efficiency at scale, this model quickly becomes unsustainable.
Finally, there’s the issue of support and service. Socioh offers a design service, but it is outsourced and not deeply embedded in performance marketing strategy. For many brands, what they need is not just outsourced design but a partner who understands creative testing, catalog strategy, and performance optimization. Socioh’s service model doesn’t provide that level of strategic depth.
Put all of these factors together, and you can see why brands that start on Socioh eventually start Googling “Socioh alternatives.”
When those brands begin comparing their options, one platform consistently stands out: Marpipe.
The most obvious difference is in feed management. Marpipe is the only creative automation platform that includes free product feed management as part of its core offering, so your feed is cleaned, structured, and monitored in real time, so missing fields or broken images never cost you conversions.
Creative is another area where Marpipe runs laps around Socioh. Instead of being stuck with static images, Marpipe automatically generates product-level video for each SKU in your catalog. This means you can run video catalog ads across Meta, TikTok, and Google without adding design overhead. Video DPAs consistently outperform static ones, so this is a direct performance advantage.
Marpipe also integrates generative AI into its creative automation. That means new ad copy, adding reviews, and generating value propositions at scale, dramatically speeding up iteration cycles.
Then there’s pricing. Unlike Socioh, Marpipe uses a flat-fee model. You don’t pay more just because your ad spend grows. This is particularly attractive for scaling brands who need predictability and don’t want their software costs tied directly to media budgets.
Finally, Marpipe’s design support model is entirely different. Instead of outsourcing to generic design shops, Marpipe offers U.S.-based, white-glove support that is directly aligned with performance marketing strategy.
When you add these features together, it’s easy to see why Marpipe is the most natural upgrade path for brands leaving Socioh behind.
It’s worth pausing here to underline why free feed management is such a big deal.
Five years ago, product feeds were treated as a back-office technical requirement. As long as your data synced with Google or Meta, most marketers didn’t think about it much. But in 2025, product feeds are creative infrastructure. They determine how your products show up in dynamic ads, how AI-driven search engines surface your listings, and even how conversational commerce tools interpret your catalog.
If your feed is messy with missing attributes, inconsistent naming, or broken images, it’s not just a technical problem. It directly impacts whether your ads deliver.
Marpipe recognized this shift early, which is why it made feed management free. Because if you’re going to automate creative at scale, you can’t do it on top of broken data.
This is the area where Socioh falls particularly short. Without feed optimization, it leaves marketers vulnerable to avoidable performance losses. And that’s why brands hitting scale see Marpipe as not just a better alternative, but a necessary one.
While Socioh is often the first catalog ad tool smaller Shopify brands experiment with, it’s far from the only option. As your store grows, you’ll quickly find that different platforms tackle different parts of the problem—some emphasize campaign automation, some focus on creative, and others try to bridge both.
Here’s how the other major players fit into the landscape, and why many scaling brands still end up choosing Marpipe as the long-term solution.
Smartly is one of the most recognizable names in paid social automation, with a strong presence among enterprise advertisers. It’s services-heavy and leans into managing ad spend and campaign budgets, but comes with high costs tied to media spend and a steeper onboarding process. If you want a managed solution, Smartly can work—but for catalog ads and feed-driven creative, it lacks depth. That’s why brands often explore Marpipe as a leaner, more specialized alternative. See our full breakdown in Smartly Review & Alternatives.
ROI Hunter is positioned around performance and product intelligence, helping advertisers surface insights about margins and profitability within product catalogs. It’s useful for teams that want analytics layered on top of feeds, but creative execution isn’t the platform’s strength. By contrast, Marpipe not only optimizes product sets but also connects that optimization directly into catalog ad creative—closing the loop from insight to activation. See more in ROI Hunter Review & Alternatives.
Hunch is a creative automation platform with strong template design capabilities. It’s a good fit for brands that need flexible creative production, but feed management is not integrated, which means you’re still left juggling multiple tools. Marpipe stands apart by pairing creative automation with free product feed management, making it more complete for catalog ad performance. Check out Hunch Ads Review & Alternatives for more information.
Abyssale is focused on creative generation, with an emphasis on image and video variations at scale. It’s appealing for marketers who want to experiment with large creative batches, but it doesn’t specialize in dynamic product ads or catalog optimization. Marpipe, on the other hand, is built specifically for catalog ads, ensuring that creative is tied directly to feed data and product performance. Read more in our Abyssale Review & Alternatives blog post.
Confect.io is known for feed-based creative templates, particularly in the European market. It’s lightweight and easy to use for smaller teams, but limited in terms of optimization and advanced catalog features. For scaling brands that need deeper feed control, product-level video, and AI-driven optimization, Marpipe provides the next step up. Learn more in Confect.io Review & Alternatives.
Socioh plays an important role in the ecosystem. It gives small brands a starting point for catalog ads, lowering the barrier to entry. But as soon as growth enters the picture i.e. more SKUs, more spend, more demand for automation, its limitations become clear.
For brands in 2025, the clear Socioh alternative is Marpipe. With free product feed management, product-level video, generative AI, and flat-fee pricing, Marpipe provides the infrastructure needed to scale catalog ads without compromise. Other alternatives like Hunch, StitcherAds, ROI Hunter, and Smartly all have their niches, but none combine these features into a single, scalable solution.
If you’ve outgrown Socioh, you’re not alone. Many brands start there but move on when their ambitions expand. And when they do, the platform they choose next is overwhelmingly Marpipe.
Book a demo with Marpipe and see how your brand can build smarter, higher-performing catalog ad systems designed for scale.
